[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    RE: KDE tarballs released to the packagers
From:       Tinkl_Lukás <Lukas.Tinkl () merlin ! cz>
Date:       2000-10-17 9:05:29
[Download RAW message or body]

> Hasso Tepper wrote:
> > 
> > Thomas Diehl wrote:
> > > On Montag, 16. Oktober 2000 18:32, Sivakumar 
> Shanmugasundaram wrote:
> > > > Does this mean, any further translations will not be
> > > > incorporated into KDE_2.0?
> > >
> > > Originally, I thought so. But another message said that 
> we can still
> > > commit until Thursday:
> > 
> > No, it means that our commits just will be in both CVS 
> branches (HEAD and
> > KDE_2_0_BRANCH) in future.
> 
> Fine. And what in the improbable case we want to fix in just 
> one of the
> two branches? After all, it's what branches are made for ;-). Can
> someone write down a brief howto?
> 
> One can imagine that we want to write the doc for some 
> changes that are
> brought by KDE 2.0.1, for example. Or fix some markup in a paragraph
> that disappeared from KDE 2.0 to KDE 2.0.1.

Just slightly off-topic: I noticed that many screenshots used in
documentation suffer from this:
- showing non-existing icons (like in kicker's docu)
- using absolutely terrible dithering (like the visual dictionary)
- not using consistently the same window decorations
- showing wrong version number (like the kcontrol overall screenshot)

Is there any chance this will be fixed in KDE 2.0?

Bye,
Lukas Tinkl <lukas@kde.org>
Czech KDE team

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]