[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: Pology - being deprecated?
From:       Yi-Jyun Pan <pan93412 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2020-01-15 14:09:29
Message-ID: CAEsM_dfErP_Ze=P3o5rbmrO3v=b5GVD=e05oFM1CVQE2oAr-WQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html

I found a unit test tool. Since I am not familiar with unittest tools,
I don't really know what kind of the unit test tool you want, but I
hope this helps you. :)

Yi-Jyun Pan

Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano@tiscali.it> =E6=96=BC 2020=E5=B9=B41=E6=9C=881=
5=E6=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=B8=89 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=8810:03=E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=
=BC=9A

> V=C3=ADt Pel=C4=8D=C3=A1k ha scritto:
> > Hello guys.
> >
> > Any clue what's up with Pology? SInce it is written in Python2 which
> > is going to be removed from the distributions, maybe it makes sense to
> > do something about it.
> >
> > I have setup and maintained Pology Summit for Czech language for severa=
l
> years.
> > WIthout Pology I wonder how to continue.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
>
> We need to port it to Python 3.
>
> The main problem is that there are no unit tests, so porting it would be =
a
> matter of manual testing and hit-and-miss. On the other hand, while this =
is
> something I shouldn't say as a quality engineering, waiting for the
> addition
> of unit tests may mean basically halting its porting.
>
> So maybe the best way forward is to create a python3 branch and start
> working
> on it, maybe from a first pass of  2to3.
>
> Ciao
> --
> Luigi
>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><a \
href="https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html">https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html</a><div><br></div><div>I \
found a unit test tool. Since I am not familiar with unittest tools,  </div><div>I \
don&#39;t really know what kind of the unit test tool you want, but I</div><div>hope \
this helps you. :)</div><div><br></div><div>Yi-Jyun \
Pan</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" \
class="gmail_attr">Luigi Toscano &lt;<a \
href="mailto:luigi.toscano@tiscali.it">luigi.toscano@tiscali.it</a>&gt; 於 \
2020年1月15日 週三 下午10:03寫道：<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid \
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Vít Pelčák ha scritto:<br> &gt; Hello guys.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Any clue what&#39;s up with Pology? SInce it is written in Python2 which<br>
&gt; is going to be removed from the distributions, maybe it makes sense to<br>
&gt; do something about it.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; I have setup and maintained Pology Summit for Czech language for several \
years.<br> &gt; WIthout Pology I wonder how to continue.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Any suggestions?<br>
<br>
We need to port it to Python 3.<br>
<br>
The main problem is that there are no unit tests, so porting it would be a<br>
matter of manual testing and hit-and-miss. On the other hand, while this is<br>
something I shouldn&#39;t say as a quality engineering, waiting for the addition<br>
of unit tests may mean basically halting its porting.<br>
<br>
So maybe the best way forward is to create a python3 branch and start working<br>
on it, maybe from a first pass of   2to3.<br>
<br>
Ciao<br>
-- <br>
Luigi<br>
</blockquote></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]