=D0=B2=D1=82, 20 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 19:58, Alexander P=
otashev <aspotashev@gmail.com>:
>
> =D0=B2=D1=82, 20 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 18:03, Mthw Mthw=
 <jari_45@hotmail.com>:
> > Currently we have to translate every "prefix-physical unit" combination=
 there is instead of translating prefixes and units separately. This means =
with, let's say, 10 prefixes and 10 units we have to translate 100 strings =
(not counting all variants like plural forms), instead of 20. Wouldn't it b=
e possible to do it this more compact way?
> > Or in another words, adding one new unit creates a need to translate al=
l its variants again including all prefixes, instead of translating just on=
e word.
>
> Hi,
>
> For Russian translation I used this sort of script to fill in the
> boring combinations of metric prefixes and units:
> https://cgit.kde.org/pology.git/tree/lang/ru/sieve/fill_units.py

Don't expect this to easily work for your language. The script is
quite old, I don't even remember when I wrote it. And looks like even
for Russian it covers only electrical units: volts, amperes, ohms.

--=20
Alexander Potashev