[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: Missing graphs with older statistics
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2018-06-24 21:05:24
Message-ID: 1671533.mjrO8nYqIk () xps
[Download RAW message or body]

El divendres, 8 de juny de 2018, a les 21:05:29 CEST, Karl Ove Hufthammer va 
escriure:
> Albert Astals Cid skreiv 08. juni 2018 20:36:
> >> But wouldn't it be possible to start *storing* the daily translation
> >> statistics now, so that in the *future* we can see statistics for longer
> >> time spans, e.g. for a custom time period?
> > 
> > It could be doable, not sure how much more disk space it'd need, take into
> > account it's lots of po files and lots of teams so space requirements
> > grows
> > very fast.
> 
> Since the statistics is only shown for each *folder*, wouldn't it
> basically be approx.
> 3 (numbers) × 8 (bytes/number?) × 65 (folders) × 109 (teams) × 365 (days)
> bytes, or about 60 MiB for a year's data (something of this magnitude,
> but of course possible a bit more or less, depending on how it's stored
> and lots of other little factors)?

But that is now how the current code works, it's using the sum of all the 
files, i.e. it never stores the "simplified value".

So it would be possible to store less info, but then again it'd need 
development manpower on something we kind of want to abandon.

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> > Also there's the fact of "we sooner than later want to kill the website"
> > and use GNOME Damned Lies since it seems there's actually people
> > maintaining it.
> Yes, seems like a good idea to use something that's being maintained.
> The latest ‘news' on the news page of l10n.kde.org is from 2010. :)
> 
> >  From a quick look it seems GNOME Damned Lies doesn't have this historical
> > 
> > stats feature, do we really need that feature? Is it useful for anything
> > else other than gamification (which is very useful in itself).
> 
> Gamification, motivating translators, bragging, … Seeing the stats
> improve is *fun*. :)
> 
> (Though the *current* translations graph doesn't really serve that
> purpose very well.)




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]