[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Special license for ca,ca@valencia and uk?
From:       Sandro =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Knau=DF?= <sknauss () kde ! org>
Date:       2018-01-02 20:25:04
Message-ID: 2652465.ZOV5b0PckF () tuxin
[Download RAW message or body]


Hey,

I spotted the issue, that not all files under po directory are licensed the same way.

as example I use akonadi-notes/17.08.3 - spotted the issue also for 17.12.0.

These three translations have a own license:

grep -rl  'This file is distributed under the license LGPL version 2.1 or' po
po/ca@valencia/akonadinotes5.po
po/uk/akonadinotes5.po
po/ca/akonadinotes5.po

Some files don't have a license header.
Not an issue at all, cause this means fall back to package license, but as most translations
make it explicit, I think it makes sense to make it explicit for every translation.

grep -rL  'This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.' po
po/pt/akonadinotes5.po
po/nb/akonadinotes5.po
po/ca@valencia/akonadinotes5.po
po/ja/akonadinotes5.po
po/ga/akonadinotes5.po
po/de/akonadinotes5.po
po/lt/akonadinotes5.po
po/sk/akonadinotes5.po
po/bs/akonadinotes5.po
po/uk/akonadinotes5.po
po/fi/akonadinotes5.po
po/it/akonadinotes5.po
po/ca/akonadinotes5.po
po/sr/akonadinotes5.po

Also consider to get rid of the useless line:

Copyright (C) 2014 This_file_is_part_of_KDE

Either mark the copyright holder one person/group/etc. or remove it completely.

Best regards,

sandro



["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]