Hi,

On 10 August 2015 at 02:04, Thomas L=C3=BCbking <thomas.luebking@gmail.com>=
 wrote:
> On Sonntag, 9. August 2015 21:39:37 CEST, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
>>
>> Do I have to do it the xcb way (get an atom, call xcb_change_property()
>> and
>> all - and does this property even have an atom)
>
>
> Yes - "unfortunately". I filed bug 351137 about this, but notice that any
> resolution will require a somewhat fixed idea about "property" handling o=
n
> wayland.

I've implemented, tested and pushed this fix in the latest commit,
available at: http://commits.kde.org/kscreengenie/0d117888985c9b538c1eba016=
c4c2f1a7c23fe68

I have not updated the documentation, so the August 15 release date stands.

-- Boudhayan Gupta