[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: Scripty and translation loss when copying from trunk to stable
From:       Burkhard =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=FCck?= <lueck () hube-lueck ! de>
Date:       2013-11-08 18:59:40
Message-ID: 2625480.EW0PSrUqiT () parodia
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Freitag, 8. November 2013, 19:40:55 schrieb Luigi Toscano:
> On Friday 08 of November 2013 19:36:18 Burkhard Lück wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 8. November 2013, 19:03:10 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> > > On Friday 08 November 2013 18:48:15 R33D3M33R wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > I have noticed today that stable/extragear-develop was updated,
> > > > probably
> > > > because of the nearing release. However, I was pretty shocked to see
> > > > that 400! strings are not translated. How is that even possible? Trunk
> > > > version of extragear-develop is almost at 100%, where did the strings
> > > > go? I can see them in the translation memory but they don't exist or
> > > > they are marked as fuzzy in stable. This isn't the first time I saw
> > > > this, this happened also for extragear-sysadmin (muon) and
> > > > extragear-network (telepathy) a while ago, but I wasn't paying
> > > > attention
> > > > back then and just translated it, since the "damage" wasn't so high.
> > > 
> > > Is this KDevelop related, yes or? I changed the "stable" branches
> > > recently,
> > > from 1.5/4.5 to the "new" 1.6/4.6. These "new" branches are what master
> > > was
> > > up until a few days ago (i.e. before the point where I created the
> > > branches).
> > > 
> > > Was this wrong? Can/should I do something else?
> > 
> > No, you did nothing wrong and especially you did not switch messages
> > extraction for kdevelop stable to 1.6/4.6, that was done by our i18n
> > coordinator.
> > 
> > Probably we could have copied translation catalogs from trunk over to
> > stable.
> 
> Yep, that's my fault, I should have done it two days ago.
> Does it mean I should refrain from doing it now, because some messages have
> been changed in stable already?
> 
From my pov yes.

-- 
Burkhard Lück

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]