--nextPart1412989.viJQgCztEx
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Monday, 2013-04-01, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:

> > This seems more a byproduct than an aim in itself: you're responsible
> > because the translators can't take all responsibility on themselves for
> > technical obstacles; what's important is probably that *someone* is
> > responsible and able of preventing and fixing mistakes. If, however, the
> > aim is having a single gatekeeper for translations, well surely it's
> > another matter; is this the point?
>=20
> The aim is having an (experienced) reviewer, who is knows to the system, =
to
> take responsibility for translation coming from users who are not known to
> the system.
> This applies also to experienced translators, as it happens that "old"
> translators send me the translations not because they would not be able to
> use svn and the tools to merge, but also because they want a review. It is
> even more important for new translators.

While it is probably not the best tool for translation changes, how about=20
"uploading" all external translations as a review request on=20
svn.reviewboard.kde.org?

Cheers,
Kevin
=2D-=20
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring

--nextPart1412989.viJQgCztEx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBRWrx4nKMhG6pzZJIRAigXAKCBe33wsC50MfVK8YvPtSV6Pox/VgCeMlDp
CEgHsn42KxhIQsJpdvi0pwQ=
=p2TU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1412989.viJQgCztEx--