Thursday 24 November 2011 [Albert Astals Cid]:
> El Dimarts, 22 de novembre de 2011, a les 17:23:28, Dawit A va escriu=
re:
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org> =
wrote:
> > > A Dilluns, 21 de novembre de 2011, Dawit A v=EF=BF=BDreu escriure=
:
> > >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Burkhard L=EF=BF=BDck <lueck@h=
ube-lueck.de>=20
> wrote:
> > >> > Am Samstag, 19. November 2011, 18:01:21 schrieb Frederik Schwa=
rzer:
> > >> >> (ok, quote on reply is gone ...)
> > >> >>=20
> > >> >> I am not sure. Your first change looks fishy. The name of the=

> > >> >> widget
> > >> >> is
> > >> >> systemProxyHttpsLabel and you change the test to SSL.
> > >> >=20
> > >> > You are right, apparently I got confused by the field label SS=
L,
> > >> > shouldn't that be something like HTTPS (SSL) Proxy to be
> > >> > consistent
> > >> > with the other labels?
> > >> >=20
> > >> > Fixed patch attached.
> > >>=20
> > >> Hmm... the attached patch and the question do not match ?? Anyho=
w, the
> > >> answer to the question is it should be either HTTPS or SSL not b=
oth. I
> > >> chose to change it to "SSL" because Firefox's proxy configuratio=
n
> > >> chooses to use that as a label and I saw no reason why we should=
 use
> > >> different labeling. What I forgot to do is update the variable n=
ames
> > >> assigned to those two radiobuttons in the UI file to reflect thi=
s
> > >> change.
> > >=20
> > > Dawit, there is an updated patch at
> > > http://lists.kde.org/?l=3Dkde-i18n-doc&m=3D132187717630659&q=3Dp3=

> > >=20
> > > Can you have a look at it?
> >=20
> > I do not see anything objectionable to that patch. However, I was n=
ot
> > able to apply it and test it against my local copy kde-baseapps
> > because it does not apply using git apply.
>=20
> Can someone please apply it?
>=20
> Frederik?

Ah, sorry. I already applied it yesterday. Forgot to report back.

Regards