[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: Backporting r1209192 to 4.6 (missing i18n -> i18nc)
From:       Alexander Potashev <aspotashev () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-12-25 21:14:11
Message-ID: AANLkTin7n+DNkFzaramUQ9-6BFKxTF99oNp932=WbYEy () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

OK from Russian team.

2010/12/25 Raphael Kubo da Costa <kubito@gmail.com>:
> (Plase keep me CC'ed as I'm not subscribed to the list)
>
> Hi there,
>
> I have just realized that when I committed some changes a few months
> ago that introduced contexts and added semantic tags to some i18n
> calls in Ark I did not replace i18n() with i18nc(), which resulted in
> the messages ending up being weirdly formatted.
>
> I've committed r1209192 [1] to trunk, and would like to know what
> should be done to the 4.6 branch: pino said the i18nc() calls would
> change the strings, so backporting this commit now might be a no-go
> since 4.6 is almost out. Should I backport it after 4.6.0 or should I
> not backport it at all, leaving the messages in 4.6 looking a bit
> weird?
>
> Thanks,
> rakuco
>
> [1] http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision=1209192
>


-- 
Alexander Potashev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]