[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: [RFC] Clean up the language docbooks
From:       Burkhard =?iso-8859-15?q?L=FCck?= <lueck () hube-lueck ! de>
Date:       2010-08-15 12:07:25
Message-ID: 201008151407.26079.lueck () hube-lueck ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Sonntag, 15. August 2010, um 13:17:44 schrieb Stefan Asserhall:
> On Saturday 14 August 2010 19.09.13 wrote Burkhard Lück:
> > Hi translation teams,
> > 
> > I see some problems with the language docbooks, see attachments:
> > 
> > * there are around 2000 obsolete language docbooks (english documentation
> > was removed, moved, merged etc...)
> > 
> > * there are a lot of old language docbooks from kde3 and even pre kde3
> > 
> > * language docbooks are not generated together with finished docmessage
> > translations, worst case is a team with always nearly fully translated
> > docmessages, but they apparently don't generate their docbooks regularly
> > and ship around 50% old docbooks, that is crazy...
> 
> The outdated-doc-4.5 contains documents from kdeaccessibility and kdepim,
> where there is a template, but no documentation available. That makes it
> impossible to regenerate the docbooks. In this case it is the templates
> that are outdated instead, and should not be there.
> 
You are apparently wrong here.
Generating all sv docbooks locally and executing "$ svn st sv/docs/" says:

M       sv/docs/kdepim/akregator/index.docbook
M       sv/docs/kdepim/kleopatra/index.docbook
M       sv/docs/kdepim/blogilo/index.docbook
M       sv/docs/kdepim/kjots/index.docbook
M       sv/docs/kdeaccessibility/kmousetool/index.docbook

> > I mailed several times here about these issues, but the situation isn't
> > getting better...
> > 
> > Please cleanup your language docbooks.
> 
> I have cleaned up the obsolete Swedish docbooks.
> 
> I noticed that the FAQ and userguide are gone, which surprised me. Has that
> been discussed? Where does a user go to get such basic information in
> his/her language nowadays?
> 
> > Cause I know from my previous mails, that not all teams either read them
> > or don't care about them, I hereby request to let me clean up the
> > language docbooks after one week.
> 
> Why not include this clean up in the scripty run generatic docmessages? I
> can't see any reason why it must be handled manually.
> 
> / Stefan	

-- 
Burkhard Lück

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]