[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: Backporting .desktop file fixes to KDE 4.2?
From:       Burkhard =?utf-8?q?L=C3=BCck?= <lueck () hube-lueck ! de>
Date:       2009-03-17 20:25:16
Message-ID: 200903172125.16711.lueck () hube-lueck ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Dienstag 17 März 2009 21:25:50 schrieb Marta Rybczynska:
> Michael Pyne wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > So, what is the plan for backporting the .desktop file security changes
> > currently in /trunk to KDE 4.2?
> >
> > Obviously I'd be doing the work, but before I go off cherry-picking
> > patches I want to know that this is something we want.  (Obviously I'm
> > lazily assuming that's you're familiar with the security changes
> > implemented for the .desktop files.  If not let me know and I'll dig up
> > the threads)
> >
> > Backporting would require breaking i18n for a new dialog in addition (so,
> > CC- ing kde-i18n-doc).  This is a security fix (with no known exploits)
> > so I do think we should backport.  I've been waiting before sending this
> > mail on the patches proving themselves in trunk.  I haven't heard about
> > any issues in awhile now so I think we're there.
> >
> > Are there any objections (or other comments)?  If not, I'll start picking
> > out the needed patches for application to /branches/KDE/4.2 at some point
> > this week.
> >
> > Regards,
> >  - Michael Pyne
>
> It's a good idea to backport the changes. +1 from the Polish team.
>
> Regards,
> Marta Rybczyńska

+1 from german team

-- 
Burkhard Lück

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]