[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: to stable/l10n-kde4 or not, that's the question
From:       "=?UTF-8?Q?M=C4=81ris_Narti=C5=A1s?=" <maris.kde () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-01-07 18:15:50
Message-ID: 9a4fa4b70801071015g25f74c1v30fd47eea725b2c5 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

IMHO current KDE system as in option a) was working fine and issue
with updating trunk with stable translations can be solved by
providing just easy step-by-step guide how to correctly do that. Good
and simple documentation is key to success.

Support for a) if somebody writes best practice guide how to merge
stable and unstable translations when 4.1 is going to be released.

Latvian team coordinator,
Maris.

2008/1/7, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org>:
> a) Is clearer in a conceptual way, that's a pro, but in the other side, it
> will create a problem having to move KDE 4.0 improved translations from the
> stable branch to the trunk branch for 4.1 and having two branches always
> makes people get lost easier
>
> Albert
>
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]