[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    to  stable/l10n-kde4 or not, that's the question
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2008-01-07 15:44:26
Message-ID: 200801071644.30396.aacid () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


Hi,

  Today I've been speaking today with Dirk about stable/l10n-kde4 and we 
reached a point where we were not sure what to do, so i'll explain the 
situation and let you people say your opinion, as you will be the 
final "users" of the decision.

So the possibilities are:

	a) Create stable/l10n-kde4 now and make it process messages of KDE 4.0.x and 
make trunk/l10n-kde4 process KDE 4.1 messages

	b) Keep using trunk/l10n-kde4 for KDE 4.0.x and create stable/l10n-kde4 and 
switch trunk/l10n-kde4 to process KDE 4.1 when real KDE 4.1 is nearer (say 
around beta 1 or so)

Pros and Cons:

a) Is clearer in a conceptual way, that's a pro, but in the other side, it 
will create a problem having to move KDE 4.0 improved translations from the 
stable branch to the trunk branch for 4.1 and having two branches always 
makes people get lost easier

b) Solves the two cons that a) option has, that's good, the only problem i see 
there is that it makes it impossible to translate 4.1, but anyone wants to 
translate 4.1 so early? I think starting to translate it around beta 1 is 
more than enough.

Both Dirk and me are leaning towards option b) as we think it makes things 
more simple but we greatly value your opinion, so please, tell us what you 
think.

Albert

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]