From kde-i18n-doc  Sun Mar 25 10:25:15 2007
From: Federico Zenith <fzenith () broadpark ! no>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:25:15 +0000
To: kde-i18n-doc
Subject: Re: digiKam and DigikamImagePlugins projects merged in svn...
Message-Id: <200703251225.18354.fzenith () broadpark ! no>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-i18n-doc&m=117491192912888
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart3414443.4oEdpn6u7x"

--nextPart3414443.4oEdpn6u7x
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Alle 10:29, venerd=C3=AC 23 marzo 2007, Gilles Caulier ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm the lead digiKam and DigikamImagePlugins developer and coordinator.
>
> I would just ping translators team than digiKam and DigikamImagePlugins
> project are now merged in svn.

Ahem, how is this exactly? I still see separate files in both trunk and=20
stable:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n/templates/messages/extragear-graphics/
http://websvn.kde.org/branches/stable/l10n/templates/messages/extragear-gra=
phics/

> - We have now just one file to translate : digikam.po.

The idea would be great, only it has not been applied properly as far as I =
can=20
see.

Let's do a proper obduction... the digikam interface GUI in trunk *does*=20
contain the plugin strings in it, alright. But why are all the other plugin=
=20
templates still there then? They should have been removed.
Note to translators: merging has been done *for templates only*. You have t=
o=20
merge your files yourself. Use msgmerge.

=46or some reason the plugin _documentation_ in trunk was removed, without =
their=20
content being merged in a single file. I suspect that they were removed by=
=20
mistake instead of the GUI files.
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n/templates/docmessages/extragear-graphics/

You announced this change to be for 0.9.2, meaning this should be a change =
in=20
STABLE, not TRUNK (which should be used for releases to 0.10 or 1.0,=20
whichever comes first).
Are you using the stable/trunk framework at all? Where are we translators=20
supposed to translate digiKam now, trunk or stable?

Cheers,
=2DFederico

--nextPart3414443.4oEdpn6u7x
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGBk4Ovpp7YV0IW4cRAqr3AJ9wjKOlzphNB8d7YkaRbhDXW+waIwCeIjL5
kwL9+FS9RfAwyieLfhPcDq8=
=mMd/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3414443.4oEdpn6u7x--