--nextPart2441547.phqNLMbmIl
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Alle 12:11, domenica 28 maggio 2006, Eloy Cuadra ha scritto:
>
> I don't think Rosetta is better for KDE localization than the current l10n
> teams' methods are. Maybe it's good enough to maintain localized only
> Ubuntu stuff (not KDE, GNOME, etc.).
>
> Even more, Rosetta is not open source. What's the point in encouraging
> people to use it?

I am completely agree.

I think Rosetta will be a good solution (even if, it is not open source) on=
ly=20
for ubuntu-specific translations.
KDE has already its own l10n framework that works fine. Maybe in future we =
can=20
take some good idea from Rosetta to improve our web interface, but I think=
=20
that currently the whole KDE translation system works as well as it should=
=20
be.

Actually I don't care about Rosetta SVN takeovers: they are not allowed.=20
Simply I will get very angry whan I will see KDE translations in Kubuntu=20
different from other distributions.

Nicola
Italian Localization Team (kde-i18n-it@kde.org)
=2D-=20
Linux Registered User #333942 http://counter.li.org

Comunque, se vuoi saperne di piu', ora dovrai operare una scelta...
"Pillola Blu": fine della storia, domani ti sveglierai, crederai a cio'
che vorrai, ma sul tuo PC rimarra' ancora Windows XP...
"Pillola Rossa": resti nel paese delle meraviglie, installerai Linux, e
finalmente scoprirai quant'e' profonda la tana del bianconiglio...
(By PLUTO Mailing list)

--nextPart2441547.phqNLMbmIl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEeYAHZxe3U3uQntQRAssvAJ4tiOHA5kKPcba3XMkgmK3i53OcmwCfYvwc
WrbkDOOcleGN5PH+pcJ2E98=
=WqvF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2441547.phqNLMbmIl--