On Monday 24 April 2006 18:16, José Nuno Coelho Sanarra Pires wrote: > Em Segunda, 24 de Abril de 2006 15:40, escreveu: > > On Sunday 23 April 2006 17:47, Erik Kjær Pedersen wrote: > > > There is a string in kdiff3's docbook that produces a fuzzy every day > > > in the translations. I think it is something about $Date being expanded > > > when various scripts are run. Maybe somebody can telle me what the > > > problem is or even better correct kdiff3's docbook. The troublesome > > > piece is the following: > > > > > > Many version control systems support special keywords in the file. > > > (e.g. \"$Date: 2006-04-23 10:37:50 -0400 (Sun, 23 Apr 2006) $\", > > > \"$Header$\", \"$Author: scripty $\", \"$Log$\" etc.) During the > > > check-in the version control > > > system (VCS) changes these lines. For instance \"$Date: 2006-04-21 > > > 17:24:21 -0400 (Fri, 21 Apr 2006) $\" will turn into \"$Date: > > > 2006-04-21 17:24:21 -0400 (Fri, 21 Apr 2006) $\". Since this line will > > > be different in every version of the file, it would require manual > > > interaction during the merge. > > > > I do not think that it is supported by the extration and merging > > scripts/programs currently. > > > > So personally I think that KDiff3's docbook should not use it. > > > > > Erik > > > > Have a nice day! > > It's the keyword substitution performed by Subversion, just like CVS does. By the way: point 18 of the KDE commit policy does still not allow it: http://developer.kde.org/policies/commitpolicy.html#18 > When committing the original file (in DocBook) to the repository, the > keyword substitution is enabled and, therefore, all sequences recognized by > Subversion as keywords, are replaced. Not exactly. Only keywords enabled in the svn:keywords property are replaced by SVN. (Please try to remove the svn:keywords property of the corresponding translated files.) > > The answer here is to disable keyword substitution on the DocBook file. > Does anyone know how to do it with SVN? That is the default in SVN, as by default each file has not any the svn:keywords property. > > It's funny: this particular fuzzy message is explaining the problem > itself. :-) > > Best regards, Have a nice day!