[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: Kexi licensing illegal? (was: Re: Error in Kexi docbook creation)
From:       Nicolas Goutte <nicolasg () snafu ! de>
Date:       2006-02-23 10:48:07
Message-ID: 200602231148.08054.nicolasg () snafu ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 23 February 2006 01:05, David Faure wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 February 2006 23:29, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:33, David Faure wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 18:27, Federico Zenith wrote:
> > > > Turns out that KWord is also LGPL
> > >
> > > Yes, and kspread too, and kpresenter. So that koffice faq is actually
> > > wrong.
> >
> > I think that I had a reason to have written it so because koffice.org
> > told it so, see for example:
> > http://web.archive.org/web/20030207094041/www.koffice.org/kspread/
> > http://web.archive.org/web/20030207094026/www.koffice.org/kpresenter/
>
> ? I'm not blaming you or anyone, 

Sorry, that is not what I meant.

I have just wanted to explain how the FAQ have been fixed at that time. (The 
version of that time was even less showing the KOffice reality.)

>I'm just stating the facts.

> The aboutdata of the apps is clear now, and the webpages don't mention
> the license anymore (most end users don't care).
> I don't care about the past and the reasons for it :)
> I fixed the FAQ btw.

Have a nice day!

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]