On Wednesday 16 November 2005 22:26, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2005 22:12, Malcolm Hunter wrote:
> > > On Monday 14 November 2005 22:27, Malcolm Hunter wrote:
> > > > On Monday 14 Nov 2005 20:46, Aurelien Gateau wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > We are planning to release version 1.3.1 of Gwenview next weekend
> > >
> > > (20th
> > >
> > > > > of November).
> > > > > If your language was not completely translated when 1.3.0 was
> > >
> > > released,
> > >
> > > > > you can update translations from branches/stable (not trunk!). They
> > >
> > > will
> > >
> > > > > be integrated in 1.3.1.
> > > >
> > > > There is no gwenview.pot in stable.
> > >
> > > I have copied the trunk version of the date 2005-09-14 (as the
> > > corresponding
> > > desktop file seems to have been created on 2005-09-13).
> > >
> > > I suppose that it is better than nothing.
> >
> > I seem to remember there are quite a few missing (I can't check easily at
> > the moment). I thought there was a more general problem.
>
> I have found out that you cannot do:
> make -f Makefile.am messages
>
> However the Makefile.am file is fine, just not a valid enough Makefile.
>

> I am wondering how many such files are in KDE.

I have checked the extracting code in kde-common/admin. Such a case is taken 
care of. (Each Makefile.am is filtered before make is called on a copy of 
it.) So the problem is only relevant when trying to make the extraction 
manually.

>
> > Regards,
> > Malcolm
>
> Have a nice day!
Have a nice day!