--nextPart16977894.lpF5TMN6fg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Alle 10:40, marted=A8=AC 14 giugno 2005, Stephan Kulow ha scritto: > Am Dienstag 14 Juni 2005 07:53 schrieb Funda Wang: > > I know that it is suggested that extragear modules maintainers should > > keep trunk version somewhere > > else. But would it be very difficult adding those modules into stable? > > There are some problems connected to it, but we're working on it. I'd like to mention one issue about extragear files in stable. In our=20 translator group we are quite dependent on our own database to assign=20 responsibilities to files (who has to/can translate what). Our system is=20 designed such as to point even the most clueless translator to the correct= =20 file in WebSVN, to avoid problems related to technical misunderstandings (i= f=20 we were to expect every translator to be confident with SVN, we would not=20 have that many). However, until now we have been working only with branches applied to entir= e=20 packages (kdeadmin, kdeutils...), and our system has been built around that= =2E=20 =46ollowing two branching subjects (main kde packages and koffice) is easy,= but=20 following each extragear file is probably going to be error-prone. I was therefore wondering whether you could cram in the stable branching of= =20 extragear some sort of machine-readable way of finding out whether an=20 extragear file is in stable or in trunk. For instance, a simple text file=20 (say, "extragear-stable") to be left on the Internet, or even better in=20 Subversion itself, possibly maintained directly by the extragear group,=20 containing a simple list of which files are to be considered in stable=20 branch. extragear-stable =2D------------------------------------ messages/extragear-office/kile.po docmessages/extragear-office/kile.po messages/extragear-graphics/kst.po (etc.) In practice what we would need would be a simple way to find out what we ha= ve=20 to translate in the extragear. Cheers, =2DFederico --nextPart16977894.lpF5TMN6fg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCrqson7A1uidpHYMRAs0YAJ92tL0Gj7Boce5G5zg+/W8uzBQnKwCfTDiX MKOgphfFDsKkoFeOnLknIbM= =pYOe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart16977894.lpF5TMN6fg--