Tom Albers wrote:

> Yes. But that seems not to be possible, so my suggestion is to use the 
> german
> po because probably the most people who understand Low Saxon 
> understand that,
> if I understand your original message correct....

That's true.

> >- we have to provide 'extra'-versions of our translation, maybe solved
> >by a script, but for more than two languages I think it's not handy 
> for us
> This I don't get.

Just to fill the empty strings in the Low Saxon po-file with the German 
strings or vice versa.

> I think this is not something that is fixable easy. I guess this 
> should be
> fixed in the program that generates the mo's from the po's, for the
> untranslated strings and in de i18n-function to fix the missing 
> strings. But
> I could be wrong here.

OK, then this seems to be an incentive for us to complete the po-files, 
where we started translation. :-)

Greets

Volker
--
Volker Jockheck - volkae@gmx.net - Low Saxon translation team