From kde-i18n-doc  Wed Feb 27 19:56:54 2002
From: Christoph Cullmann <cullmann () babylon2k ! de>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:56:54 +0000
To: kde-i18n-doc
Subject: Re: kwrite handbook
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-i18n-doc&m=101483993031835

On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:21, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2002 17:32, David Faure wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 February 2002 01:33, matthschulz wrote:
> > > Wasn't kwrite supposed to go sleep in favor of kate?
> >
> > Yes and no. Kate provides a simplified version of itself under the na=
me
> > "KWrite".
>
> But is it worth keeping two handbooks? I was quite suprised to see a
> kwrite handbook.
The problem is that: kate has a emacs style mdi, kwrite not, kate has=20
filelist, kwrite not, kate has: fileselector, plugins, .... kwrite: not ;=
))
The problem would be, to get one handbook with both stuff inside, which w=
ould=20
cause to seperate the handbook in 2 areas: use kate, use kwrite
But I think having a doc for each app is much better (and the current kwr=
ite=20
doc needed that much work ;)

>
> Greetings, Stephan

--=20
| Christoph Cullmann
| Kate/KDE developer
| cullmann@kde.org
| http://kate.kde.org