[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n
Subject:    Re: protocol stuff (was: Re: KFM Error)
From:       Alex Zepeda <garbanzo () hooked ! net>
Date:       1999-04-01 1:16:49
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Simon Hausmann wrote:

> 2) Or (if I understand you correctly) we can create a special kioslave,
> being called whenever the protocol lookup for a slave fails (someting like
> "DefaultProtocolSlave" ) . This slave might then look for the appropriate
> bindings.

Yes!  That's exactly what I mean.  And this would have the added benefit
of perhaps handling truely unknown protocols in a rather elegant way.

> Since I'm not really sure about 2) (...and I'm not sure whether I really
> understand the idea ;) ) I think 1) is the better way to go. This would
> also make sure that the additional protocol services, not being handled by
> the protocol manager, are not available for kiojob, but only explicitly or
> by krun.
> Hm,... I start really getting confused about this ;-) .
> Do we really want to "override" the protocol manager for protocols not
> being handled by an ioslave?

Well I think that number two is a bit simpler if I do say so myself.

- alex

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]