[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n
Subject:    Re: 1.0 and the time after that
From:       Stephan Kulow <coolo () kde ! org>
Date:       1998-07-12 22:36:02
[Download RAW message or body]

Sebastià Pla wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 11 Jul 1998, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> 
> >You will have to decide, if you want to make the
> >1.0 tree better or leave it behind and concentrate
> >on the current sources or on both. It's completly
> >up to you.
> >
> >If you use cvs or cvsup, you can use the tag
> >kde-1-0-branch to get the most recent version
> >to make updates to. If not, just get the latest
> >version and let me fight with your patches :)
> >To everyone, that does more updates than once
> >a month, I would suggest out of this reason to
> >use one of cvs or cvsup. For cvs usage just drop
> >me an encrypted passwd (before you ask: /etc/passwd
> >or /etc/shadow).
> >
> >If you have further questions, feel free to ask here.
> 
> Hi Stephan,
> 
> I don't understand what you mean. Do you mean we can
This is exactly the kind of question I didn't meant ;-)

> commit our translations directly to cvs instead of sending
> them to you ? What would be the procedure to follow if
> we want to make the 1.0 better and at the same time try to
> keep current with the development sources ?
> 
Well, I didn't mean the commiting part at first, but this
could be of course part of the thing. I meant, that you can
download the latest sources from there without big problems.

See 1.0 and 1.1 as two different source trees. If you want
to maintain both, you need to have two get both the 1.0
versions and the daily po_files or both from CVS(up). At
least cvs is able to switch both trees, so I would guess,
cvsup can do the same for you.

I hope, you understood me.

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
OLD NAME:    Stephan Kulow 
NEW ADDRESS: Kleine Altef(ae)hre 11 / 23552 L(ue)beck
NEW NUMBER:  49-451-7060735
OLD EMAIL:   coolo@kde.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]