From kde-games-devel  Sun Oct 10 16:41:56 2010
From: Mauricio Piacentini <piacentini () kde ! org>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:41:56 +0000
To: kde-games-devel
Subject: [Kde-games-devel] Re: Knights moved to kdereview
Message-Id: <4CB1ECD4.3010500 () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-games-devel&m=128672896300338

On 10/10/2010 10:14 AM, Frederik Schwarzer wrote:
> 
> What I wanted to say here (besides flagrantly pushing the split
> module approach) is that it might be a good idea to not make
> decisions on the basis of structures that will probably not be
> here long anymore and especially to not question those structures.
> It's wasted time.
> 
> Let's discuss the switch to Git (the "how"s and "who"s; the
> "when"s are decided elsewhere) and if that is done, rethink
> what we have and ways of improving it.
> 
> Opinios?

+1 here.
The way I see it there is a good advantage in having per-app git repos
as you mentioned, specially concerning bandwidth and disk space savings.
This way each app can maintain its whole history (including moves to
playground/kde-review/unmaintained/back to playground), and we would not
be creating a monster repo that is not really interesting for people
that want to hack on one game only, or two. Writing conversion rules for
the whole module + playground would be complex for a monolithic repo, I
think.

Regards,
Mauricio Piacentini
_______________________________________________
kde-games-devel mailing list
kde-games-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-games-devel