[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-games-devel
Subject:    Re: [Kde-games-devel] When will background be configurable? (was:
From:       "Richard Hartmann" <richih.mailinglist () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-11-18 22:46:16
Message-ID: 2d460de70811181446v4c1efc3he641292b22235e7e () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 19:05, Matthew Woehlke
<mw_triad@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Parker Coates wrote:
>> I personally think the independent selection of card fronts and backs
>> is a simple case of over customisability. When buying a real deck of
>> cards, you're pretty much stuck choosing the front and back at the
>> same time.

> I still don't like making fronts and backs inseparable. What about
> standardizing on some common sizes, and restricting the choice of backs
> to those matching the "shape" of the deck? You can still do "unusual"
> decks; they just won't have many choices of back. But "standard"-sized
> decks can have many choices. (And a back can provide more than one
> "shape", of course.)

I agree that restricting the user to defaults is a bad thing. Offering some
defaults is fine, but even on old Windows versions, you could pick and
mix your own cards.


Richard
_______________________________________________
kde-games-devel mailing list
kde-games-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-games-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]