Bernd Gehrmann wrote:

> > 3. There is nothing in the license that forbids linking commercial
> >    applications with library code released under the QPL.
>
> My understanding is that TT does not distinguish between commercial
> and non-commercial, but between free and non-free, where
> 'free' := source code available + freely redistributable +
> modified versions allowed (cum grano salis)
> IMHO, this distinction makes much sense.

If this is true, IMHO the last obstacle for Qt to become an accepted standard
has been removed.
And this also removes the _last_ obstacle for us using Qt in house? Granted we
accept free redristibution (we do).

   Christof