[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-freeqt
Subject:    Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony
From:       Mosfet <mosfet () jorsm ! com>
Date:       1998-11-22 17:53:37
[Download RAW message or body]

cet@elinux.net wrote:
> 
> Mosfet wrote:
> >
> > Okay, this is getting no one anywhere and I see no need to get into this
> > any further. The people who developed large parts of Harmony are not
> > stupid, they can decide for themselves if they want to continue or not.
> 
> We finally agree on something.  Good.  No hard feelings; we just have
> different points of view.
> 
> > I think most already have made their decision. In the meantime, I have
> > actual KDE/QT code to write.
> >
> > Hopefully, it will be with a free version of QT that contains the
> > efforts of both Troll Tech and the Open Source community.
> >
> > One thing I can help with is that if any of the developers do wish to
> > support the OSS QT2.0 but don't have the time or energy to port the
> > code. I am somewhat experienced with QT's source and know QT and KDE
> > well. This hindered me with the Harmony project before, but can be quite
> > useful if you have code you think should be in 2.0. Feel free to contact
> > me if that is the case. I want the most powerful OSS QT library as
> > possible for KDE, and would be happy to help make that happen by trying
> > to translate the code into something that will work within QT.
> 
> I'm afraid not.  I seriously doubt that TT will separate their commercial
> and free QT products into two different code bases with two different
> feature sets.  That's what they'd need to do because the combined work would
> be termed a "derivative work" of Harmony under the LGPL since it serves the
> same purpose.  TT would have to LGPL QT (or the free version).  I think that
> would satisfy all of us, but I don't see TT doing it.
> 

If the developers of Harmony want to submit their work as patches to 2.0
they are more than welcome to. They assigned the original LGPL, and they
can make their code QPL if they so desire.

You would have the old code to play with, of course - which would remain
as LGPL.

I really wish you wouldn't speak for the Harmony developers, who at
least some don't seem to take your view. 

> > I defintely don't want everyone just to walk away and see all the work
> > done here go to waste. It would be nice to see the best of both used.
> 
> It won't go to waste.  There are people who will finish Harmony, it will
> just take more time.

Your more than welcome to. I'm asking the developers of Harmony what
they want to do with their code.

>

Let the developers decide that, thank you.
 
> Thank you for the debate.  We don't agree on how to best serve the Linux
> community, but I can see that you care.
>

The debate seems over. Let us work now, please...

 
> Later,
> Carl Thompson

-- 
Daniel M. Duley - Unix developer & sys admin.
mosfet@jorsm.com
mosfet@mieterra.com
ksiag@lowrent.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]