[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-freeqt
Subject:    Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony
From:       Mosfet <mosfet () jorsm ! com>
Date:       1998-11-22 3:28:28
[Download RAW message or body]

Olivier Galibert wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Nov 22, 1998 at 01:54:31AM +0000, Mosfet wrote:
> > RMS does have some valid points about distribution, but I think that his
> > assertion that maintaining a whole new toolkit is logistically easier
> > than working with the patch+pristine code regulation is wrong. Anyone
> > who has looked at either Harmony or TT's source can see why ;)
> 
> Actually,  one could say  that I did have a  look  at Harmony's source
> given that I wrote around one third of it, and I do consider the patch
> regulation to be a pain in the ass.
> 

More so than writing around 1/3rd of it? ;)
Actually, I agree - it is a pain in the ass. Hopefully something better
can be resolved before the final QPL draft.
 
>   OG.

-- 
Daniel M. Duley - Unix developer & sys admin.
mosfet@jorsm.com
mosfet@mieterra.com
ksiag@lowrent.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]