[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-frameworks-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE Frameworks with failing CI (master) (7 April 2024)
From:       Ben Cooksley <bcooksley () kde ! org>
Date:       2024-04-10 8:59:31
Message-ID: CA+XidOEci7eSDRAYQ=e8GS3EKy0L7h=goUzTR4Ukn+WhPyWFFQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:33 AM Volker Krause <vkrause@kde.org> wrote:

> On Sonntag, 7. April 2024 23:02:06 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs
> on
> > their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> > reasons.
> >
> > Bad news: 3 repositories have started failing
> >
> > kconfigwidgets - NEW
> >  * https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfigwidgets/-/pipelines/655246
> >   * klanguagenametest fails in Linux
> >    *
> https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfigwidgets/-/merge_requests/234
> >
> >
> > kcontacts - NEW
> >  * https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcontacts/-/pipelines/655247
> >   * AddressTest::formatTest fails in FreeBSD
>
> That's the same issue that also hit kitinerary. As I haven't gotten any
> answers for my questions about what changed on the CI there I've now
> disabled
> this test for FreeBSD for kitinerary, I can do the same for KContacts I
> guess.
>

To give a public answer about this - there was a general image rebuild to
take into account a number of updates to various libraries.
It seems something in the FreeBSD stack has gotten loose as part of this so
we'll need to do some more investigation.


>
> > kuserfeedback - NEW
> >  * https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kuserfeedback/-/pipelines/655248
> >   * The code requires unreleased versions so flatpak fails
>
> Hm, that's a systematic problem: We cannot do Flatpak builds in a KF
> master
> branch on top of an existing runtime.
>
> Doing Flatpak builds only in the stable branch wont work here given there
> is
> no such branch. So the options I can think of are either building all KF
> dependencies explicitly here rather than using those from the runtime, or
> splitting the management/analytics tools (which is what the Flatpak is
> actually for) from the library.
>

I'd probably suggest splitting them at this stage given the issues we keep
hitting here...


>
> Regards,
> Volker


Cheers,
Ben

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On \
Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:33 AM Volker Krause &lt;<a href="mailto:vkrause@kde.org">vkrause@kde.org</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid \
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Sonntag, 7. April 2024 23:02:06 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:<br> \
&gt; Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on<br> &gt; their 4th \
failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for multiple<br> &gt; reasons.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Bad news: 3 repositories have started failing<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; kconfigwidgets - NEW<br>
&gt;   * <a href="https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfigwidgets/-/pipelines/655246" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfigwidgets/-/pipelines/655246</a><br> &gt;     * \
klanguagenametest fails in Linux<br> &gt;      * <a \
href="https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfigwidgets/-/merge_requests/234" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfigwidgets/-/merge_requests/234</a><br> &gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; kcontacts - NEW<br>
&gt;   * <a href="https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcontacts/-/pipelines/655247" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcontacts/-/pipelines/655247</a><br> &gt;     * \
AddressTest::formatTest fails in FreeBSD<br> <br>
That&#39;s the same issue that also hit kitinerary. As I haven&#39;t gotten any <br>
answers for my questions about what changed on the CI there I&#39;ve now disabled <br>
this test for FreeBSD for kitinerary, I can do the same for KContacts I \
guess.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>To give a public answer about this - there was a general image \
rebuild to take into account a number of updates to various libraries.</div><div>It seems something in \
the FreeBSD stack has gotten loose as part of this so we&#39;ll need to do some more \
investigation.</div><div>  </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <br>
&gt; kuserfeedback - NEW<br>
&gt;   * <a href="https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kuserfeedback/-/pipelines/655248" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kuserfeedback/-/pipelines/655248</a><br> &gt;     * The \
code requires unreleased versions so flatpak fails<br> <br>
Hm, that&#39;s a systematic problem: We cannot do Flatpak builds in a KF master <br>
branch on top of an existing runtime.<br>
<br>
Doing Flatpak builds only in the stable branch wont work here given there is <br>
no such branch. So the options I can think of are either building all KF <br>
dependencies explicitly here rather than using those from the runtime, or <br>
splitting the management/analytics tools (which is what the Flatpak is <br>
actually for) from the library.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I&#39;d probably suggest splitting \
them at this stage given the issues we keep hitting here...</div><div>  </div><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid \
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <br>
Regards,<br>
Volker</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Ben  </div></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]