[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-frameworks-devel
Subject: Re: Scrap Baloo Thread Feedback
From: Aleix Pol <aleixpol () kde ! org>
Date: 2016-10-07 16:20:54
Message-ID: CACcA1RpBbyRa3JXphKW5mk2kx5SHrPmr4wtqki=YCo0pawcr2g () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Vishesh Handa <me@vhanda.in> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Kevin Funk <kfunk@kde.org> wrote:
>> On Friday, 7 October 2016 17:24:26 CEST Vishesh Handa wrote:
>>> Hey guys
>>>
>>> I was told there is a thread about scrapping Baloo. All Baloo
>>> discussion used to happen on kde-devel and that's where the review
>>> requests go. It's the only reason I am still subscribed to kde-devel.
>>
>> Heya,
>>
>> Baloo is a framework nowadays, therefore it totally makes sense to have the
>> discussion on kde-framework-devel.
>>
>> There's been tons of discussion around Baloo on kde-framework-devel already.
>> kde-frameworks-devel is also where the CI messages for the baloo repo go to.
>>
>> It likely makes sense for you to subscribe, no?
>>
>
> I don't understand why all framework discussions must happen on the
> same list. It just adds to a crazy amount of noise, which one then
> needs to parse through.
Arguing that it should be elsewhere because you'd like to ignore the
rest of the traffic in kde-frameworks doesn't sound very constructive,
especially considering how they're the "noise" that actually improves
the frameworks.
Maybe you can better configure your e-mail client differently so we
can focus on the issue at matter?
Aleix
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic