[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-frameworks-devel
Subject:    Re: What's the point of tiers if we bend the definition of them?
From:       Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4=DFlin?= <mgraesslin () kde ! org>
Date:       2015-03-17 7:21:22
Message-ID: 2225280.bDPz4R3D3u () martin-desktop
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday 16 March 2015 23:16:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> We have KPackage depending on kdoctools but since it's optional we pretend
> it's not a real dependency and call KPackage tier2
> 
> What's in it for us other than lying to ourselves? What's so bad about
> KPackage being tier 3?
> 
> It'd still have only 3 dependencies and be totally usable, no?

Maybe it needs to document both:
* without optional packages it's tier 2
* with optional packages it's tier 3

I can imagine that this will be interesting for more frameworks where it could 
be that depending on which platform we run on it's a different tier 
(kglobalaccel is currently tier 1 for non-X11, but tier3 on X11).

Cheers
Martin
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]