[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-frameworks-devel
Subject:    Re: KPeople part of KDE Frameworks
From:       Michael Pyne <mpyne () kde ! org>
Date:       2015-03-03 2:38:28
Message-ID: 2384466.3SMqW8eDty () midna
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, March 2, 2015 21:22:32 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 2 de març de 2015, a les 20:49:45, Martin Klapetek va escriure:
> > Makes me think that maybe the review process does not work that well...
> 
> Correct, the review process doesn't work well at all, and hasn't been for a
> long time, there's not enough people with enough different skills reviewing
> the apps/libs.

In any event, I think the review process (even if it were working very well) 
would not cover scheduling concerns but rather code quality, use of proper 
infrastructure, stuff like that.

But for scheduling, the default assumption would always be that the module 
being reviewed would simply land in the next routine release. The process 
needed to review a set of modules to be included in a *specific* release would 
be different. Since I'm a part of our failed review processes I can't tell you 
which route we tried to go by, but I would hope that collectively would handle 
things better for the question "We want to release KFoo in 15.04" vs. "We want 
to include KFoo in KDE Applications".

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne
_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]