[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-frameworks-devel
Subject:    Re: KPeople part of KDE Frameworks
From:       Martin Klapetek <martin.klapetek () gmail ! com>
Date:       2015-03-02 0:47:00
Message-ID: CAPLgePpEddicAG6enOB4bH-LAHy86UmqYhxYnD3RS1vjDe-0WA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


I would just like to point out that the review period of KPeople
is over and all the associated moves are in order, are they not?
What exactly is "enormously rushed" when the review period
is over and moves are rightfully requested? Perhaps that should
have been said in either of the "please review this proposal" emails
before, not after.

KDE Telepathy also already has a dependency on KPeople
since ever, so there's no new dependency added. It's just being
moved from kdereview to frameworks. Is that a dependency
freeze violation? I read "it is not allowed to add new dependencies"
in the release schedule page. That is not what is happening.

The only rush is to get KPeople tarball released a bit sooner so
that it can be there for KDE Applications Beta 1. That is all.
And that tarball could just as well be made from kdereview.

(and yes I'm a bit annoyed by all this crap I'm getting for this
only now and not a month before when was the right time)

Well thanks everyone anyway, you've done enormously good jobs.
I owe you one.

Cheers
-- 
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">I would just like to point out that the \
review period of KPeople</div><div class="gmail_extra">is over and all the associated \
moves are in order, are they not?</div><div class="gmail_extra">What exactly is \
&quot;enormously rushed&quot; when the review period</div><div class="gmail_extra">is \
over and moves are rightfully requested? Perhaps that should</div><div \
class="gmail_extra">have been said in either of the &quot;please review this \
proposal&quot; emails</div><div class="gmail_extra">before, not after.</div><div \
class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">KDE Telepathy also already has \
a dependency on KPeople</div><div class="gmail_extra">since ever, so there&#39;s no \
new dependency added. It&#39;s just being</div><div class="gmail_extra">moved from \
kdereview to frameworks. Is that a dependency</div><div class="gmail_extra">freeze \
violation? I read &quot;it is not allowed to add new dependencies&quot;</div><div \
class="gmail_extra">in the release schedule page. That is not what is \
happening.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">The only \
rush is to get KPeople tarball released a bit sooner so</div><div \
class="gmail_extra">that it can be there for KDE Applications Beta 1. That is \
all.</div><div class="gmail_extra">And that tarball could just as well be made from \
kdereview.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">(and yes \
I&#39;m a bit annoyed by all this crap I&#39;m getting for this</div><div \
class="gmail_extra">only now and not a month before when was the right \
time)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Well thanks \
everyone anyway, you&#39;ve done enormously good jobs.</div><div \
class="gmail_extra">I owe you one.<br clear="all"><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div>-- \
<br><div class="gmail_signature"><div><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">Martin \
Klapetek | KDE  Developer</span></div></div> </div></div>


[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]