[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-frameworks-devel
Subject:    Re: Workflow Idea for 4.10
From:       Kevin Ottens <ervin () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-03-18 19:24:54
Message-ID: 1562693.mpkoVHtcrM () wintermute
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 16 March 2012 21:31:11 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Sounds good.
> But OTOH, having one workflow for KDE frameworks (i.e. not even all of KDE
> SC) would be also a really good thing to have. It will make contributing
> easier.

That's pretty much Aaron's point yes. And I clearly see the value in it of 
course. I've to take into account the current drawbacks identified with the 
current proposal too though.

> Would 2) be an option for KDE frameworks ?

Could be[*]. But as you probably gathered from my previous email I'm 
purposefully not jumping on a definitive choice just yet. More options to 
investigate and consequences to take into account.

Regards.

[*] If we were to bless a single one, it's the one with most chances to make 
it as the one size fit all one in my books ATM.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]