On Thursday 16 November 2006 10:22, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 22:23, Kleag wrote:> Hello,>> Le lundi 13
> novembre 2006 14:54, Helio Chissini de Castro a écrit :> > Hi people (
> again )> >> > Trunk will be kde4.>> I perfectly agree with the Helio's
> arguments. In fact, I have a kde4> version of kgraphviewer ready at its old
> repository, I don't plan any new> feature in te KDE3 version and this is a
> somewhat little application. So, I> personaly have really no reason to not
> use trunk for KDE4, but I understand> the opposition of teams not ready for
> the porting.>> Note that I my (little) experience, porting to KDE4, with
> the Qt and KDE> tools, is quite easy. it is far from easy in big apps.
> Especially if you want to get rid of the qt3 support
> libs.

Agree. K3b and digiKam&co are big project. And i'm sure than automatics port 
scripts (if exists) will give strange results (:=)))...

In fact, i prefer port source code by hands and learn at the same time. This 
is why it will take a while.

Gilles Caulier
_______________________________________________
Kde-extra-gear mailing list
Kde-extra-gear@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-extra-gear