[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-extra-gear
Subject:    Re: [Kde-extra-gear] backwards compatibility
From:       blackie () kde ! org (Jesper K !  Pedersen)
Date:       2004-01-27 12:35:24
Message-ID: lwllnta7sj.fsf () catatonia ! blackie ! dk
[Download RAW message or body]

Klas Kalass <klas.kalass@gmx.de> writes:

| Am Montag, 26. Januar 2004 17:40 schrieb Jesper K. Pedersen:
| > Klas Kalass <klas.kalass@gmx.de> writes:
| > | Hi all,
| > |
| > | it was brought to my attention that there arises a problem with some
| > | applications requiring an up-to date version of KDE and thus needing
| > | MIN_CONFIG(3.2) in the configure file, unfortunately this means
| > | that everybody who wants to stay backwards compatible needs to make sure
| > | by themselves to change configure.in.in locally prior to a release.
| > | Otherwise your packages will require KDE 3.2.
| > |
| > | Any ideas how we can handle this more elegantly?
| >
| > Maybe I'm stating the obvious here, but couldn't we just move around, so
| > those requiring 3.2 would be in say kdeextragear-3 (That doesn't exists
| > yet, does it?)
| That would mean that applications in the extra gear would be shuffled around 
| whenever a maintainer wants to use a newer KDE version for his/her app.
| I don't like that because noone should have to check all the modules just to
| find out where his/her favourite app went.
personally I think this is better than forcing developers to edit files in
the last sec before a release - which I'm sure I personally will forget
like every second time, and thus all to often release software that doesn't
work for older versions.

Cheers
Jesper.
_______________________________________________
Kde-extra-gear mailing list
Kde-extra-gear@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-extra-gear
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]