[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-edu-devel
Subject:    [kde-edu]: Re: kde-edu is now on git
From:       Ian Monroe <ian () monroe ! nu>
Date:       2011-04-05 13:04:12
Message-ID: BANLkTi=Ca5CakAn3GBB00fZEpY3v3POJQA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Currently the kdegraphics meta-repo looks a bit like its just a hack
to aide in the development of the kdegraphics tarball.

But as a longterm solution, cmake does have some pretty magical
advanced stuff to allow you to build dependent packages that I think
we could use to make a meta-repo. And then there's also kdesrc-build
of course.

Ian

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 01:25, Aleix Pol <aleixpol@kde.org> wrote:
> Yes, it would be nice to have one to rule them all :)
> Aleix
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Filipe Saraiva <filip.saraiva@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> 2011/4/4 Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabrava@kde.org>
>> > I'm not sure if we have, but the
>> > https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdeedu/ does exists.
>>
>> But he is not a repository as kdegraphics (at least not yet).
>>
>> 2011/4/4 Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabrava@kde.org>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if we have, but the
>>> https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdeedu/ does exists.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Filipe Saraiva <filip.saraiva@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > There will be an optional super-repository for kdeedu? Something like
>>> > KDE
>>> > Graphics (https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/) ?
>>> >
>>> > Thank's,
>>> >
>>> > 2011/4/4 Sebastian Stein <seb_stein@gmx.de>
>>> >>
>>> >> Ian Monroe <ian@monroe.nu> [110404 19:50]:
>>> >> > Enjoy. :)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The 4.6 branch and master will now be developed in Git. SVN is
>>> >> > locked
>>> >> > read-only.
>>> >>
>>> >> That is really great news!
>>> >>
>>> >> But now starts the trouble: How do we work with git? I have seen that
>>> >> there
>>> >> was a meeting about it, but as far as I can tell, there is no final
>>> >> outcome
>>> >> or even agreed workflow.
>>> >>
>>> >> I cloned kbruch, but now I wonder how to move forward? Is it expected
>>> >> that
>>> >> all feature development happens directly in master or shall we create
>>> >> branches? And if we use branches, are there any naming conventions?
>>> >>
>>> >> Is this document
>>> >>
>>> >> http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda/StevesIdea
>>> >>
>>> >> the one to follow at the current point?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks in advance,
>>> >>
>>> >> Sebastian
_______________________________________________
kde-edu mailing list
kde-edu@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]