From kde-edu-devel Fri Apr 28 12:17:35 2006 From: "Jure Repinc" Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:17:35 +0000 To: kde-edu-devel Subject: Re: [kde-edu]: [RFC] KPhysics - Interactive physics experiments for Message-Id: <51418.84.52.174.5.1146226655.squirrel () 84 ! 52 ! 174 ! 5> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-edu-devel&m=114622651912963 On Fri, April 28, 2006 8:44, Carsten Niehaus said: >> Is there there any documentation you would recommend reading about >> making the framework/plug-ins structure in Qt/KDE or in general? > > No clue.. Have a look at KDevelop I guess... OK I'll take a look in KDevelop. Kopete also uses plugins for protocols I guess. And digiKam too. >> How do SourceForge and Berlios compare? Pros/cons? How is it then >> with >> moving to KDE SVN into playground? > > Both provide svn, sf.net is bigger. I think it doesn't matter. I've asked for an account on KDE SVN. I'm also one of the main Slovenian translators for KDE so I guess I have two reasons now for acount. But I will take a look at both SF and Berlios and alsocreate an account there. >> How do you monitor those changes? Is there any special page that >> lists >> the changes in each snapshot. If there is no such a page then maybe >> it >> would be usefull to others if it existed. > > That is easy :-) The kdelibs4_snapshot is updated ever second monday. > Then > recompile against it and see what breaks. There is also a > .html-document in > kdelibs which tells you all changed things. So you see a error in > KFoo, you > look for KFoo in the html-doc and it tells you what you should do now. Oh yes, I see this HTML document now, and thanks for the pointer. Then I guess it will not be all that hard to keep in touch with changes. Thanks again for comments. -- JLP's Blog - http://jlp.holodeck1.com/blog/ _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@mail.kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu