From kde-edu-devel Sun Aug 04 18:11:48 2002 From: Michael Hofer Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 18:11:48 +0000 To: kde-edu-devel Subject: [kde-edu-devel] Re: [kde-edu]: Re: new project / ktimes? X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-edu-devel&m=102848670804090 Hello! First of all: Thanks for your answers and your tips. I didn't realize that there are separate user- and devel-kde-edu-lists so= my=20 original mail went to the wrong list. I introduced the idea of a mathematic-training-program / -game. If you ha= ve=20 missed my original posting on kde-edu, you can find it here: http://lists.kde.org/?l=3Dkde-edu&m=3D102846457323602&w=3D2 Am Sonntag, 4. August 2002 19:14 schrieb Dominique Devriese: > "Mahfouf Anne-Marie" writes: > > I think it would be better to start a new project with your idea. In > > the future, it could still be merged with > > KTimes if we want to. > > Erm.. are you sure ? These two seem to me like rather similar apps, > and having two of these IMHO is not consistent to the user, a waste of > developer time etc. Also: merging is not as simple as you seem to > think.. I made a similar mistake when i started Kig, and i'd very much > advise against it. I have the same objections as Dominique. I think it would be better if th= ere=20 was a common architecture/structure. The program could be "splitted" in a= =20 children/training-mode and an adult/competition-mode. Even if the two parts do not exactly the same thing, there are many=20 similarities.... Also seen from a "marketing" standpoint, I think it would be better to ha= ve=20 one "well known" KMathTrainer(?) than two more mini-apps. I am going to read some KDE-development-docs now and will try to make me=20 familiar with KDevelop and all the unix-dev-tools. Any comments, ideas, suggestions and help are, as always, highly apprecia= ted. servus, Michael _______________________________________________ kde-edu-devel mailing list kde-edu-devel@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu-devel