[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-edu-devel
Subject:    [kde-edu]: Re: Preparation for the move to git
From:       Peter Hedlund <peter () peterandlinda ! com>
Date:       2011-02-03 23:55:03
Message-ID: 84807C05-C125-4E1B-827D-600332AD55F1 () peterandlinda ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Peter Hedlund <peter@peterandlinda.com> wrote:
> 
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:15 PM, Daniel Laidig wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday 03 February 2011 22:56:13 Peter Hedlund wrote:
> > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> > > > Hi KDE-Edu devels,
> > > > 
> > > > Now that kdelibs and kdebase have been moved to git, the rest of KDE will
> > > > soon follow. Ian "eean" kindly offered to write the rules for kdeedu,
> > > > thanks to him!
> > > > 
> > > > Before the move we need to ensure that all subprojects build standalone
> > > > (without breaking the overall kdeedu build as well).
> > > > KBruch maintainer Sebastian did that earlier today
> > > > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdeedu/kbruch/CMakeLists.txt?r1=1009581&r
> > > > 2=1218675
> > > > 
> > > > While it's easy for small projects, it is probably a bit more work for
> > > > Marble which is more complex. Can the Marble team look into it quite
> > > > quickly? Any problems can be discussed here and if necessary we'll ask
> > > > for help. Same for KStars.
> > > > We also need to take care of the libs as we discussed and noted on
> > > > http://community.kde.org/KDE_Edu#Git_Migration
> > > 
> > > Without cmake and library development skills it's definitely the handling
> > > of the keduvocdocument lib that is giving me problems. Either we keep all
> > > applications using it together or I/we need help making a proper library
> > > out of it.
> > 
> > What happened to the patch Niko Sams  wrote in December? Didn't it already do
> > all this (i.e. create proper libraries and cmake modules and make apps build
> > standalone)?
> 
> OK, good. I found it. The patch needs to be updated due to all the fixes done by \
> Marco to several cmake files. 
> If an up to date patch is applied I don't anticipate any problems migrating \
> KWordQuiz. 
> Thanks,
> Peter
> 
> 
> > > Anne-Marie, how do you plan to handle KHangMan since it is one of the
> > > programs using it?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Peter
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > kde-edu mailing list
> > > kde-edu@mail.kde.org
> > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
> > _______________________________________________
> > kde-edu mailing list
> > kde-edu@mail.kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kde-edu mailing list
> kde-edu@mail.kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
> 
> Why don't we commit these patches to svn already and remove kdeedu/CMakeLists.txt?
> 
> That way the responsability to have each app compiling is the maintainer, and \
> that's what we're looking for, right?

Sounds like a plan to me.

Peter


_______________________________________________
kde-edu mailing list
kde-edu@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic