From kde-doc-english  Sun Sep 07 22:10:45 2014
From: Jack <ostroffjh () sbcglobal ! net>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 22:10:45 +0000
To: kde-doc-english
Subject: Re: [kde-doc-english] checkXML vs meinproc4
Message-Id: <1410127845.26205.32 () ffortso4>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-doc-english&m=141012969124705

On 2014.09.07 11:06, Jack wrote:
> I finally took a more careful look at the definition of  
> <inlinemediaobject> and noticed it could be directly in <para>.  This  
> means I can change
> 
> <para> text </para>
>   <screenshot>
>   <mediaobject>
>   <imageobject>
>   <imagedata fileref="csvImporter_1.png" format="PNG" />
>   </imageobject>
>   </mediaobject>
>   </screenshot>
> 
> to
> 
> <para> text
>   <inlinemediaobject>
>   <imageobject>
>   <imagedata fileref="csvImporter_1.png" format="PNG" />
>   </imageobject>
>   </inlinemediaobject>
> </para>
> 
> and get the result I want.  Is there any reason not to make this  
> change?

Yuri,

I'm not sure if the problem is simply the image tags within the text  
tags, or just that it can make the text sections appear excessively  
long.  In my case, I think every image would be at the end of a  
paragraph, not in the middle of one.  However, given that, I could also  
do:

<para>
   text
</para>

<para>
    <inlinemediaobject>
    <imageobject>
    <imagedata fileref="csvImporter_1.png" format="PNG" />
    </imageobject>
    </inlinemediaobject>
</para>

I haven't checked on what other tags I might use, but this would at  
least separate pure text paragraphs from paragraphs with only a single  
image.  Would this still be a problem for translation?

Jack
_______________________________________________
kde-doc-english mailing list
kde-doc-english@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-doc-english