From kde-doc-english Sat Sep 06 22:16:44 2014 From: Jack Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 22:16:44 +0000 To: kde-doc-english Subject: Re: [kde-doc-english] checkXML vs meinproc4 Message-Id: <1410041804.26205.28 () ffortso4> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-doc-english&m=141004181807435 On 2014.09.06 17:32, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Jack ha scritto: > > On 2014.09.04 14:27, Luigi Toscano wrote: > >> Jack ha scritto: > > [snip] >>>> Up until now, all screenshots in the manual have been wrapped in >>>> , , , and tags. >>>> For a new chapter, I was trying to avoid the lines above and below >>>> the image, so I used inlinemediaobject instead of mediaobject. >>>> Meinproc4 accepted this, and the output was just what I wanted: >>>> apparently identical to using mediaobject but without the lines. >>>> checkXML complains this is not valid. How much should I be >>>> concerned about this? Is there another way to eliminate the lines? > >> >>> inlinemediaobject is used even in the example template in the >>> kdelibs/kdoctools sources (I assume it's kdelibs4, otherwise look >>> into frameworks/kdoctools); could you please paste the relevant >>> docbook section (including the tags which encloses the >>> inlinemediaobject) and the exact error? > > > > Given this code > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > checkXML says > > >> details-impexp-csv.docbook:101: element screenshot: validity error : >> Element screenshot content does not follow the DTD, expecting >> (screeninfo? , (graphic graphicco | mediaobject | mediaobjectco)), >> got (inlinemediaobject ) > > > > ^ >> Given the definition of screenshot, this does make sense, but using >> mediaobject instead of inlinemediaobject produces a line above and >> below the image, which I don't want. Meinproc4 actually does what I >> want, but as part of a full make on the application, it is >> apparently called with --check, as it generates the error. I find >> the lines distracting, and think they imply a break that isn't >> there. Is there any way to suppress them? > > So, few points: > - the definition of the DocBook DTD does not allow inlinemediaobject > inside screenshot tag. meinproc4 --check is not wrong and it's not > going to be changed: the document is not valid as it is. It's like a > compiler error. I understand and agree with this. > - at my level of docbook knowledge, I'm not sure it's a problem of > the specification or of the rendering, but I bet the rendering. And > I'm not sure what is the best way to achieve the effect you want. Do > you mean that the additional lines are added on docs.kde.org, or On > the rendered documentation in khelpcenter? Is the reason for removing > them an rendering one (i.e. it looks "better")? I agree it is a rendering issue. I see the lines both on docs.kde.org and in khelpcenter. As an example, look at http://docs.kde.org/stable/en/extragear-office/kmymoney/firsttime.3.html. There is a line above and below every screenshot. In some cases, I don't think it makes any difference, but in many cases, I feel it creates an unnecessary and undesired discontinuity in reading. Yes, it's a personal opinion. In many cases, I would probably leave them, but there are some cases where I find them very distracting. I don't necessarily need a way to remove them from the rendering of I want to find a way to get the same rendering without the lines. I don't care if I must use some attribute for some tag, or even if I must use a different set of tags. Jack _______________________________________________ kde-doc-english mailing list kde-doc-english@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-doc-english