From kde-doc-english Thu Sep 04 18:27:31 2014 From: Luigi Toscano Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:27:31 +0000 To: kde-doc-english Subject: Re: [kde-doc-english] checkXML vs meinproc4 Message-Id: <5408AF13.6070909 () tiscali ! it> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-doc-english&m=140985526817614 Jack ha scritto: > I probably should not be, but I was just surprised to discover that these two > are apparently not using the same set of rules. I'm working on the KMyMoney > manual, and have just been checking my edits with meinproc4, partly to confirm > the layout is what I expect. However, I just ran checkXML, and it complained > about numerous issues. checkXML is just a small shell script which calls meinproc(4) --check. The --check parameter validates the document against the DTD, otherwise meinproc just verify that it's a correct document. > In one case, I need some further advice. > > Up until now, all screenshots in the manual have been wrapped in , > , , and tags. For a new chapter, I was > trying to avoid the lines above and below the image, so I used > inlinemediaobject instead of mediaobject. Meinproc4 accepted this, and the > output was just what I wanted: apparently identical to using mediaobject but > without the lines. checkXML complains this is not valid. How much should I > be concerned about this? Is there another way to eliminate the lines? inlinemediaobject is used even in the example template in the kdelibs/kdoctools sources (I assume it's kdelibs4, otherwise look into frameworks/kdoctools); could you please paste the relevant docbook section (including the tags which encloses the inlinemediaobject) and the exact error? Ciao -- Luigi _______________________________________________ kde-doc-english mailing list kde-doc-english@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-doc-english