From kde-doc-english  Thu Sep 04 17:37:21 2014
From: Jack <ostroffjh () users ! sourceforge ! net>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:37:21 +0000
To: kde-doc-english
Subject: [kde-doc-english] checkXML vs meinproc4
Message-Id: <1409852241.26205.1 () ffortso4>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-doc-english&m=140985225416163

I probably should not be, but I was just surprised to discover that  
these two are apparently not using the same set of rules.  I'm working  
on the KMyMoney manual, and have just been checking my edits with  
meinproc4, partly to confirm the layout is what I expect.  However, I  
just ran checkXML, and it complained about numerous issues.

In one case, I need some further advice.

Up until now, all screenshots in the manual have been wrapped in  
<screenshot>, <mediaobject>, <imageobject>, and <imagedata> tags.  For  
a new chapter, I was trying to avoid the lines above and below the  
image, so I used  inlinemediaobject instead of mediaobject.  Meinproc4  
accepted this, and the output was just what I wanted: apparently  
identical to using mediaobject but without the lines.  checkXML  
complains this is not valid.  How much should I be concerned about  
this?  Is there another way to eliminate the lines?

Thanks for any suggestions.

Jack
_______________________________________________
kde-doc-english mailing list
kde-doc-english@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-doc-english