On Saturday 07 January 2006 13:39, Lauri Watts wrote:
> On Saturday 07 January 2006 11:31, Brad Hards wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 January 2006 19:47 pm, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> > > 2) Convince manual authors to a) relicense their works under the GPL,
> > > or b) double-license them under both the GFDL and GPL.

I have some questions:
1: Would Debian accept something like the BSD documentation license (with or 
without the copyright notice requirements) as an alternative dual license to 
the GPL?
(See: 
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/LEGALNOTICE.html )
2: Would Debian accept an exception clause along the lines of the Qt license 
exception clause, excising the objectionable parts of the FDL?
3: Specifically are there any other licenses I didn't mention (and which 
versions of those licenses) that are acceptable to Debian as either
  3a: The sole license on a document, or
  3b: A dual license along with FDL as we use it today.

Regards,
-- 
Lauri Watts
KDE Documentation: http://docs.kde.org
KDE on FreeBSD: http://freebsd.kde.org
_______________________________________________
kde-doc-english mailing list
kde-doc-english@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-doc-english