On Wednesday 15 August 2001 10:57 am, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> "Dijkstra's 'goto considered bad' is spot on," so you know that C++

AFAIR reading Dijkstra, it was 'goto considered bad and should be 
replaced wherever possible by while, for etc' which are also hidden 
gotos... You don't trash 'for' just because it is wrap around 'goto'.

-- 
WBR,
TAnGorN
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<