From kde-devel  Tue Jul 31 08:24:38 2001
From: Michael Brade <Michael.Brade () informatik ! uni-muenchen ! de>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 08:24:38 +0000
To: kde-devel
Subject: Re: reason behind fno-exceptions?
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=99656784803514

On Tuesday 31 July 2001 10:16, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Die, 31 Jul 2001, Michael Brade wrote:
> > > > C++ exceptions horrible/horribly implemented, and if you do serious
> > > > work where you need to know whats going on you deactivate them or use
> > > > C.
> > >
> > > Now I'm really curious on how to use exceptions with C.
> >
> > I think you misunderstood, he meant: if you don't want exceptions you
> > either disable them or you use C.
>
> Oh, then its even worse. I'd never attempt to use C for any serious work.
> Its the same with Perl btw. It might be nice for a hack between getting up
> and having breakfast, but not when it comes to larger projects. I can only
> laugh about those poor people who have to reimplement the virtual-method /
> method paradigm with cpp tricks and similiar just because their poor
> language has no support for such fundamental principles. If I want real
> masturbation I use assembler, not C.
*LOL*

> BTW I consider using C++ and C++ with exceptions to be two different
> things, as you need two completely different programming paradigms for
> these variants. Mixing both only combines both's disadvantages though.
Yup, agreed.

Ciao,
 Michael

-- 

       Some operating systems are called `user friendly',
             Linux however is `expert friendly'.
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<