On Tuesday 31 July 2001 00:28, Martijn Klingens wrote:
> > What's wrong with C++ exceptions, besides the fact that they cause
> > large memory overhead with gcc ?
>
> "besides" ? I think that single argument is convincing enough... Actually,
> I also think it's the only argument, but I haven't heard stronger arguments
> that often...

This whole thread made me experiment a bit, and now I'm positively confused. 
On my system / compiler (x86, Linux 2.4.7, glibc 2.2.3, gcc 2.95.3), I can't 
get more than about a tenth of a percent reduction in resident set size 
through -fno-exceptions from a couple of toy projects, regardless of whether 
the code was using exceptions originally or not. Under what circumstances 
does this overhead become noticeable? Maybe only in shared libraries?

Ciao,

Daniel.

-- 
pnambic@unu.nu -- Pay No Attention to the Man BehInd the Curtain
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<