On Tuesday, 12. June 2001 15:13, Rob Kaper wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 03:22:52PM -0700, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> > > I thought we agreed that kdesupport is a convenience module for CVS
> > > compilers only and should _not_ be released/packaged?
> >
> > That's not the case. I think you missed the message in which I pointed
> > out that we need mimelib from kdesupport.
>
> I didn't miss it, but I did not realize that conflicts with the "keep it,
> don't package it" idea of David.
>
> It does seem like a waste of resources to package an entire kdesupport just
> for the modified mimelib, though. I say:
>
> - put unmodified stuff in kdesupport and don't package it
> - put modified stuff elsewhere (mimelib in kdenetwork)
>
> This provides maximum convenience and it allows for kdesupport not to be
> packaged.
Yes and I will do that as time permits

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
People in cars cause accidents. Accidents in cars cause people.
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<